[Text] December 2003 | Number 68 | REVIEW
[Image] Visiting engineering student Maritz Rykaart is profiling layers of waste rock to test the aging of the properties that contribute to acid rock drainige.
[Text] 'In Rio Tinto we have some risk-prone sites, but also our ARD success stories.' - Dave Richards
[Image] ARD pollution, Queen River, Queenstown, Tasmania, caused by ancient copper mines upstream
[]

Information gathering is still going on, ranking Group sites by hazard in order to target further more detailed assessment. During this stage, only innate hazards are covered, without take into account existing counter-measures and their effectiveness. When the full picture has been put together it will almost certainly show that stakeholders in the few Group mines that are prone to ARD, and the natural environments of those mines, are being well protected against the menace from acid rock drainage, while the additional information will help achieve further improvements in ARD prevention and management.

As Dave Richards sums it up: "ARD is a very complicated subject. In trying to explain it you have to be honest both about the potential risks and about the scale of the problem. But it must be kept in proportion. Under-reacting can be hugely costly, over-reacting can be very wasteful.

"In Rio Tinto we have some risk-prone sites, but also our ARD success stories. Our policy, and all the work we are doing on ARD, is designed to build on experience and give our decision makers the information they need to make choices for the future."

Chris Morrissey is a former chief geologist of the Group.

Review is published by Rio Tinto,
6 St James' Square, London
SW1Y 4LD, England
Telephone +44 (0)20 7930 2399
Editor: Cherry DeGeer